1. The Defendant: 69,901,50 won to Plaintiff A; 5,302,110 won to Plaintiff B; 5,623,450 won to Plaintiff C; and 4,71.

1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;

(a) project approval and public notice - Railroad Construction Project (F) - Public notice: G publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on December 22, 2014, and H-project operator announced by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on July 29, 2015: Defendant

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on February 26, 2016 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”) - The land subject to expropriation as indicated in the column for “land subject to expropriation and obstacles” in attached Table owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “land subject to expropriation”) in attached Table owned by the Plaintiffs: Compensation for losses for each land owned by the Plaintiffs is as indicated in the column for “amount of adjudication” in attached Table, and compensation for losses shall be determined at 49,185,000 won for each land owned by the Plaintiffs, and compensation for losses shall be determined at 49,185,00 won for each land owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”) - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation that is future, new appraisal corporation, and Sam Chang Chang (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”)

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) dated October 27, 2016 - Contents of the ruling: 50,456,500 won for losses for the obstacles owned by the Plaintiff, and the remainder of the Plaintiff’s objection and the remainder of the Plaintiffs’ objection are dismissed, respectively - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation and one appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisal”)

D. Results of the appraiser I’s appraisal (hereinafter “court appraiser”) - Contents of the appraisal as stated in the “court appraisal amount” column under the attached Table No. 3: (a) there is no dispute; (b) each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including each number); (c) the result of the appraiser I’s appraisal; and (d) the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The compensation for the instant land, etc., which was determined by the Plaintiffs’ assertion, the instant expropriation ruling and the instant ruling, was significantly unfair.

Therefore, it is true.