The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment for a term of one year, two years of suspended sentence, probation, and community service order) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant refused to take a alcohol test and failed to measure the blood alcohol content of the Defendant at the time of the instant crime, the Defendant’s blood alcohol content was not measured. However, on November 22, 2010, at Daejeon District Court sentenced a fine of KRW 2 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in Daejeon District Court on November 22, 2010, the Defendant caused the instant accident that conflict with the taxi of the victim C driving who was normally driven while under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol without being sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million.

However, in full view of various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable, and thus, it seems that the Defendant’s vehicle is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s vehicle is subscribed to the automobile liability insurance. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee established by the Supreme Court, the traffic crime group, the first type of the crime of general traffic accident (in the event of traffic accident), the special form of persons (in the event of illegality), the recommended range of the recommended sentence (in the case of heavy importance), the recommended range of sentence (in the case of August to June), the recommended range of sentence (in the case of imprisonment), and other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.