A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 23, 2019, around 23:30 on July 23, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B: (a) laid down a tent closed at the “D” in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government operation of the victim located in Seongbuk-gu and intruded inside the inside; (b) laid down goods equivalent to the total market value of KRW 81,600 in plastic bags, such as one lux, three lux, three lux, one moto-ro, one moto-ro, one moto-ro, one lux-ro, one lux-ro, one lux, ten ropo-ro, one lux-ro, ten ropo-ro, one ro

2. Around 23:40 on July 23, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E: (a) laid down a tent closed in the “G” operated by the victim located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul; and (b) invaded inside the tent; (c) placed the victim’s possession of the goods worth KRW 152,00,00 in total of the market price, including two string-down vehicles, two string-up vehicles, two string-up vehicles, one string-up vehicles, and one string-stop vehicles.

3. On July 24, 2019, at around 00:03, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim H: (a) when entering the entrance to the “J” of the victim’s operation in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul; (b) when entering the entrance, and intrusion inside the entrance; (c) when the victim’s 59 punishment on the female clothes owned by the victim, the 59 punishment, the 23 punishment, the 5 punishment, the 400 square meters, the 400 square meters, the 500 square meters, the 400 square meters, the 500 square meters of the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to B, E, and H;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Photographs of each damaged article;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (CCTV search);

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, there is no significant amount of damage caused by the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and most damaged goods were returned to the victim, and intrusion into a place other than a residential space is favorable.

On the other hand, it is difficult to understand that there are many criminal records of a fine of the same kind, and that it is a crime committed in a planned manner by viewing that it has been carried out in the house, and that it is a motive to commit a crime that is hard to understand that it was stolen to do gift to the people.