logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.05.12 2017고단127
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 4, 2017, the defendant found C Apartment 1206 at Jeju, which is the house of the male-friendly family, around 01:20.

B. During the 112-year-old Police Station of Jeju Dong-dong Police Station: (a) took a bath to identify personal information from E, “the same bit of bitbit of bitbit of bit of bitbit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of son of 112, who was called out after receiving the report of 112; (b) tried to kill the above E with bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of son.

Defendant continued to be transferred to the Jeju Police Station D District Office in the Jeju Police Station in G at around 01:50 on the same day, and H to the police officer belonging to the said police station in the Jeju Police Station in the Jeju Police Station without any justifiable reason.

All police officers of the Republic of Korea are Domine.

C. C. Drier, C.

The Babbbucks, etc. used the bucks of the above H, and used the bucks, etc. to walk the bucks of the above H, and used the toilet at the office of the above district office at around 03:50 on the same day, and the police officer unfolded the lock, but the bucked by affixing his face with his photograph without being taken on the toilet, and the bucked the disturbance. The police officer of the above district group used the buckbbbbbbbbs, etc. one time to walk the bucks of the above I, which are likely to walk the Defendant again.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and crime control.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;

arrow