1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and Defendant B are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff and the Defendant B respectively.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "B" in Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter "the contract of this case") is "B" (hereinafter "the contract of this case") under the contract of this case; "B" witness of the first instance court "B"; "B" of the same part 11 and the third part 4; "B" of the court of first instance includes the party's personal examination result of the court of first instance "B" of the same part 403 and the 401, 402 and 404 of the apartment house of this case including the real estate of this case and the area of "B" of the 401, 404 and the 401, 501, 501, and the 111, as well as the 301, 400, 400, 404, including the following additional number at the first instance court's first instance court's request and the 10, "the grounds for its request and amendment."

2. Additional matters to be determined;

A. As to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Plaintiff asserted that the appeal by Defendant B was unlawful on the ground that the appeal by Defendant B was made by an unauthorized agent. However, in light of the respective descriptions of the evidence Nos. 15-1 through 3, attached with the certificate of the personal seal impression, etc. issued as of September 5, 2016, the Plaintiff and Defendant B, etc., prepared as of June 11, 2016 and the record of conversation Nos. 4 and 5-1 and 2, which are the “statement of statement” of Defendant B, prepared as of June 14, 2016, are insufficient to acknowledge the above assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and there is no reason to acknowledge it (the Plaintiff’s assertion that the “certificate of the delegation” was made by the coercion of Defendant B’s attorney or the mistake of Defendant B. However, it is without merit.