1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows. The court’s explanation of this case is consistent with the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, since the part No. 5 and No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, other than the second instance, are the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this is

2. The main part of the judgment of the court of first instance (No. 5th part of the judgment), however, comprehensively taking account of the following: (a) the statement of evidence No. 3-1 to No. 3, evidence No. 4 and No. 5, evidence No. 2-1, No. 2, and evidence No. 6-1, and the overall purport of the pleadings as a result of the inquiry into the police station at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial; (b) there is no sign of the plaintiff vehicle after the first accident, and the vehicle was left alone one lane as it is; (c) the defendant's driving of the vehicle at the time of driving the vehicle at the time of the first accident was 01:30 meters prior to the point of the first accident; and (d) the driver of the vehicle at the time did not have an emergency warning before driving the vehicle; and (d) the driver of the vehicle at the time and the police box at the time did not have an emergency warning to the driver of the vehicle at the police station at the time of second accident.