A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 9. 20. 03:55 경 안양시 동안구 평 촌대로 223번 길 42에 있는 중앙 프 라자 앞 길거리에서 싸움이 났다는 112 신고를 받고 현장에 도착한 안양동안경찰서 B 파출소 소속 경찰공무원 피해자 C이 피고 인의 일행 D를 상해 피의사실로 현행 범인으로 체포하여 B 파출소로 동행하려고 하자 몸으로 위 피해자를 막으면서 피해자가 D를 체포하지 못하게 방해하고, 계속해서 왼손으로 임의 동행을 요구하는 피해자의 가슴팍을 밀치는 등으로 피해자를 폭행하였다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of reported cases, crime prevention and suppression, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the arrest of flagrant offenders (D copies), screen pictures, and the closure of screen pictures;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution - Unfavorable circumstances: Crimes committed by assaulting a police officer who performs the duty of arresting a flagrant offender are not easy. - favorable circumstances: The defendant's mistake is recognized, reflective, and the defendant is the primary offender;