logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.09.04 2014고정474
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:40 on December 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 7, 2013, at the “D Frequencybook” located in C, and (b) 6 members of the victim G (the age of 45) who were seated in the Defendant’s side table, and E, were able to fight the horses at the end of the vision; (b) she saw the victim’s face level at one time during the process of speaking.

At this time, the dynamics of the victim G (ma, 35 years of age) with the above time, and the table bables were broken in the course of the sled fish, etc., so that the flue disease was defrised to the Defendant’s wife, and the flue disease fluence was profed by the Defendant’s wife, and the Defendant fluenced the victim H’s face at one time.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim G and H, respectively, such as a non-alleys that require three-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement made by witnesses G in the third protocol of trial;

1. Copy of the protocol of examination of the witness to I;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. A copy of the report processing book; and

1. Each injury diagnosis letter [G refers to the fact that she was assaulted of nose as at the time, while she sees with E at the time, while she was sexually in dispute, she was the only male of the defendant if excluding E during the daily activity of the defendant, she was the only male of the other defendant, she was a woman of the other defendant, and I, the frequency of the case, clearly stated in the court that the defendant committed the assault to G (at the time of the assault, there is credibility considering the contents, circumstances, and overall purport of the statement, although there is a somewhat different difference in the statement about the time of assault), 1 hour after the occurrence of the case, G's husband was asked of the fact that she was injured by nose at the time of the crime committed by her husband at the time of the police, and G was diagnosed by her husband at the J hospital following the following day. Accordingly, it is recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on G as at the time of criminal facts

arrow