logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.10.30 2018가단113598
손해배상(국)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 27, 1969, the Plaintiff entered the Army as a private soldier, but was on January 26, 1970. (2) The Plaintiff was on March 29, 1971 to March 5, 1973, and participated in the Vietnam War and was recognized as a military commander on August 13, 1971. The Plaintiff was awarded the Order of the French Military Service Merit on March 16, 1972, and was promoted to China on August 1, 1972.

3) On March 9, 1973 through August 20, 1974, the Plaintiff served in the 15th Army Team from March 9, 1973 to August 20, 1974, and from August 21, 1974 to June 30, 1975, the Plaintiff was transferred to the third unit of the Army, on July 5, 1975, and the Plaintiff was discharged from military service who did not want to be discharged on April 30, 1976 in accordance with the personnel order of the third unit headquarters.

B. On February 7, 1974, 1974, 1) the Plaintiff’s lodging room B was charged with voluntary acting in the form of imprisonment without a warrant by the investigators belonging to the Central Information Department, and was detained on February 13, 1974. 2) The network B was issued with a warrant of detention and detained on February 13, 1974. From November 1, 1963 to November 1, 1966, 74 high 160, 175, 181, 196 (Joint Violation of Public Law, etc.) and was charged with aiding and abetting the activities of North Korea in the G, D, and E as the charges of aiding and abetting the activities of North Korea from November 1, 1963 to November 1, 196, the Seoul Criminal Court was sentenced to imprisonment for life on July 24, 197.

3) However, on October 29, 2015, the judgment of innocence was finalized on October 29, 2015 (Supreme Court Decision 2015Do8834 Decided October 29, 2015) (Supreme Court Decision 2015Do8834 Decided October 29, 2015). [The fact that there is no dispute over grounds for recognition, entry of evidence A1 through

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion by the parties is the Central Information Division of the Defendant.

arrow