1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff initially entered the Republic of Korea on September 13, 2005, with the status of stay for industrial training (D-3) on September 13, 2005, as foreigners of the nationality of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”).

The Plaintiff, upon changing the status of stay for training employment (E-8) and extending the period of stay on September 12, 2008, went to the Republic of Korea on August 30, 2008, and went to the Republic of Korea on August 30, 2008. On October 2, 2008, the Plaintiff, who entered the Republic of Korea again with the status of non-professional employment (E-9) and then stayed in the Republic of Korea by October 1, 201 and applied for refugee status recognition to the Defendant on September 30, 201.

B. The Defendant, on July 3, 2013, “a well-founded fear of persecution” (amended by the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on August 16, 2013, but was dismissed on April 11, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was made by the plaintiff as the hydropath of the origin from Punja Jhak region, and around September 2008, when the plaintiff staying in the Republic of Korea and visited Pepakistan, the religious violence between Enpha and Enpha wave occurred in the above area. However, around September 18, 2008, the plaintiff asked the plaintiff's propath and Enphath of the plaintiff, who was living in the friendship and Enpha from his members, about 16:00 of Sep. 18, 2008, and asked the plaintiff's Enphath of whether he was a hydropatha, who assaulted the plaintiff's act, she escaped from the public, and the plaintiff's act was "I am".