A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

In fact, the Defendant owned a D business entity under his own name from June 10, 2005 to practically operated D, while possessing the name of wife E (name prior to the opening of name: F). E is a person who saws in the above D and performed the operation of saws and saws in the above D, and I is a person who performed the operation and management business in the above D from June 1005 to March 2005.

On May 2, 2012, the Defendant transferred the instant D’s business license to H, received KRW 200 million, and made it unclear the ownership relationship. On June 13, 2012, the Defendant was prosecuted and tried on suspicion that he was declared bankrupt by filing an application for individual bankruptcy with the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012Hadan6077, Seoul Central District Court. On June 13, 2012, the Defendant argued that the said D is the ownership of the wife E, and that he is not related to the said D, and that he/she asked E and I to testify to testify to the effect that he/she is not related to the said D.

1. The Defendant issued testimony to E (the same day) on the ground that he had actually operated the above D from the beginning stage of the establishment of the said D, and that E had not operated the above D, on April 22, 2014, E had been present as a witness of the above criminal case before E before E was present as a witness of the above criminal case, and had E testified that he was not involved in D at the time of testimony. In particular, when the testimony was made at the time of the establishment of D, he did not appear to have been at all at the time of D, he did not talk that he had operated D, and the testimony that he had been operating the D was made late, and that the testimony was made by the testimony that he had not been involved in D before he was present at the time of his testimony. In particular, when the testimony was made at the time of the establishment of D, the testimony was made to the effect that he had no participation in D at the time of his internal work.