logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.11.30 2016구합81321
직접생산확인취소처분취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiffs are corporations engaged in the business of manufacturing and installing cranes, and Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) obtained confirmation of direct production from the Defendant with the term of validity from March 11, 2014 to March 10, 2016, while Plaintiff B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) had the term of validity valid from August 27, 2013 to August 26, 2015, respectively.

B. On August 7, 2014, Plaintiff A participated in the tender for the “D fishing village fraternity multi-purpose solar facilities business” that was conducted by the former E-Gun for the verification of direct production of the participation in bidding (sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub) and supplied the aforementioned c.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant product” in combination with the athletes.

Around February 2015, the Defendant received a civil petition that a company located in South Korea is in violation of direct production after obtaining the certification of direct production, and after undergoing a fact-finding survey, the Defendant held a hearing to deliberate on the grounds for revocation of the certification of direct production on June 22, 2015 for Plaintiff A, and for Plaintiff B, on June 15, 2015. The Plaintiffs acknowledged the fact that the boom boom, etc. from G (hereinafter “G”) was purchased and supplied from a boomer structure produced and supplied by the Plaintiffs during the above hearing, and the Defendant confirmed the boom production of the structure subject to the verification of direct production of a boomer at the hearing on July 22, 2015.

arrow