logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.12.21 2018고합189
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that the defendant's defense right is not substantially infringed, the phrases of the facts charged were modified.

The defendant committed the following crimes in a state that he/she has a lack of the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the existence of fluoral illness and severe fluoral alcohol:

In order to enter the criminal facts of 2018, 2018, 203 in order of time, the criminal facts of 2018, 2018, 203, 2018, 2018, 189, were first stated on the criminal facts of the case.

1. On December 209, 2017, from around 20:30 to 21:45, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol at the victim C’s convenience store operated by the victim C in the same ducheon City, stated, “The facts charged are stated as follows: (a) the act of creating fear of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act on the same day, namely, creating fear of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act; (b) however, it is insufficient to recognize the above motive solely on the fact that the Defendant was tried by the said judgment, and there is no other evidence to

Examining the C’s statement, the police interrogation protocol, etc. against the Defendant, the Defendant appears to have avoided the disturbance at the convenience store under the influence of alcohol, and thus, it will be written as a transitional fact.

The victim, "the police does not have any fluoral fluor", "the police did not have any fluoral fluoral fluor", and brut it.

Since the Defendant was detained due to the trial at the time of his decision, that was, he could not interfere with his duties because he was detained due to the trial at the time, he argued that C filed a false report. In light of the case, trial records and investigation records, etc., the Defendant appears to have been investigated about the trial at the time, i.e., to have been unfolded immediately. At the time of his police investigation, there was a fact between D convenience points exceeding eight hours

In light of the fact that C stated the statement and that there is no particular circumstance to make a false statement, it is recognized that the Defendant committed a crime interfering with one’s own business on December 9, 2017, and that it is different.

arrow