Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 39,160,000 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from October 23, 2013 to February 10, 2015 for the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On September 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to provide services for landscaping design (hereinafter “instant design contract”) to the Defendant, setting the contract amount of KRW 120 million from September 2012 to April 2013, with respect to landscaping design of the Plaintiff’s KPEV VLE construction implemented by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant design contract”).
The main contents are as follows:
Article 3 (Scope and Areas of Services)
1. Scope of services - Basic design;
2. Design of an outside space other than buildings. Article 5 (Method of Payment of Service Amount)
1. When entering into a contract: 30% placed snapping 36 million won (in addition, snapping snapping snapping);
2. When the basic design is submitted (final fluorite drawings): 40% 48 million won (excluding additional tax).
3. When submitting a working drawing: 30 per cent n. 36 million n. n. 3) Article 6 (Preparation and Submission of Service Performance Records) Section 6 (No. 3), Article 6 (No. 3) of the [Attachment] (name of the Defendant] (name of the Plaintiff) shall prepare three copies and one copy of the design documents (performance records) completed within the scope of Article 3 and deliver them to the Plaintiff (name of the Plaintiff) within the contract period.
2. Where any of the following events occurs in the course of performing the duties under this contract pursuant to Article 9 (Termination of Contract) of the CAD drawings (1) landscaping planning drawings 2) landscaping planning drawings 3) planning drawings 4) packing planning drawings 5) packing planning drawings 6) main part 7) planning drawings 4) planning drawings 9 (Cancellation of Contract) above, the whole or part of this contract may be revoked, or the contract may be terminated:
1. When a new plan has been modified or revoked due to the circumstances described in A;
2. If it is found evident that he/she is unable to perform design business within a fixed period of time under B;
at the time of agreement between the parties A and B: Provided, That the contract period may be extended when both parties agree.
3. Where the design drawings supplied by Eul cause enormous impediment to Gap;
4. The content of Gap’s request for change of design is in conflict with Eul’s intent.