logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.22 2016나30844
구상금
Text

1. The appeal of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: on the third page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "specific" of the 18th sentence shall be read as "specific person"; on the 5th page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the 5th to the 6th part of the 12th part of the 12th part of the 12th part of the 12th part of the 12th part of the 15th part of the 16th part of the 16th part of the 16th part of the 16th part of the 19777, "A against the plaintiff, who is the insured of the 196th part of the 16th part of the 196th part of the 197 part of the 12th part of the 12th part of

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified within the scope of the above recognition and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified as it is consistent with this conclusion, and all appeals by the defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow