logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.04 2012나103136
부당이득금반환
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant B corporation is modified as follows. A.

Defendant B.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case, including the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows: (a) the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except to supplement and add the judgment of the next three, and (b) are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of

2. Revised parts

A. The following is added to the right side of the 2nd 10 representative director (the defendant D has resigned from the representative director on September 7, 2002 and Q Q has served as the representative director on July 31, 2006, but the defendant D again became the representative director on July 31, 2006)

B. The 4th 11th 11th son paid the following modifications, and the Defendant C sub-leaseed some of the stores of this case to another person and then appropriated the Plaintiff’s sub-lease deposit and premium with the re-lease deposit. Defendant C made a sub-lease contract with the R on December 7, 2005 with the amount of KRW 170,000,000,000,000 for the sub-lease deposit with the amount of KRW 89 to KRW 47.97 square meters among each of the stores of this case, and KRW 17,70,000,000,000,000,000 for the monthly rent, and KRW 1,70,000,000,000,000 for the sub-lease deposit from the R on January 7, 206.

C. The 5th 5th 5th 6th 6th 6th "1.185 million won by December 6, 2005" was modified as follows (=1.185 million won by 1.15 million won by January 7, 2006 + 1.15 million won by 70 million won)

D. 7 pages 2 were modified as follows, and around April 2008, the store of this case was delivered to F.

(e) by adding “(2) Certificate 2” of the 7th parallel parallel to “2 and 3”, and including “including”; hereinafter the same shall apply).

F. 9. The witness S’s testimony appears to be consistent with the Plaintiff’s assertion on the right side of the nine 12 parallels “ difficult,” the following is likely to believe;

(g) revise “1.185 billion won” for 11th 7 parallels to “1.355 billion won”;

(h) 11.1 billion won for the first place “265.0 million won” shall be 435.0 million won for the first place.

arrow