logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.15 2018누66908
업무정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is as follows 2. The relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding the part of the judgment of March 200), and such part is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

2. 5-4 below the 6th 5-4th 6th e.g. “(see Constitutional Court en banc Order 2014Hun-Ba298, Jul. 30, 2015)” [see Constitutional Court Order 2014Hun-Ba298, 357, 2015Hun-Ba120, Jul. 30, 2015, Constitutional Court Decision 2015Hun-Ba120, Jul. 30, 201). The revised 8th e.g., “205 No. 105” in the revised 10th 7th e.g., “B and 13. 5th e.,” and the Plaintiff’s revised 11-9th e.g., “S. 200” in the revised 7th e., “S. 3rd e., e.,” and the Plaintiff’s amendment of indictment cannot be viewed as an intentional charge of fraud.

arrow