The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) requested D Mart in Nam-si C to sell 32,000 won at KRW 5,980 to an employee in non-name at KRW 32,00; (b) but was refused, the Defendant’s summary of the facts charged ought to be the end if he/she discovered feasia, inside feasia, and reported inside scars.

The victim E (Ch. 43) who was an employee at the place of the disturbance of “,” etc. used the victim’s chest at one time, and used the victim’s chest at one time, and used the victim’s neck.

2. We examine the judgment, and the above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent in accordance with Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

On November 8, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, the victim E withdrawn the intent to punish the defendant.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.