1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

(b) there is a lack of recognition and there is no other obvious evidence to recognize it;

A) In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in the statement No. 15, the statement No. 15, the confirmation statement of each object of brokerage in relation to each of the instant lease agreements of this case (hereinafter referred to as “statement

It is recognized that there are the following items. The explanatory note is 30,000,000 brokerage remuneration and actual expenses and brokerage remuneration and 2,970,000 won: [30,000 (3,000,000)] = 330,000,000 x 0.9% of brokerage remuneration and value-added tax may be imposed separately by consultation between the client and the practicing licensed real estate agent within 9,000,000 won. The brokerage remuneration and value-added tax may be imposed within 0,000 won per annum 2,970,000 [this case concerning one lease contract of this case] brokerage remuneration and actual expenses 】 1,980,000 won per brokerage remuneration and 30,000 won per annum 】 [30,000,000 brokerage remuneration and value-added tax-added tax-related brokerage remuneration and 30,000 won per annum 】 (30,000,000 won per brokerage remuneration and per annum 】

B. However, in light of the following circumstances, the evidence mentioned above and the statements stated in the evidence Nos. 3 and 12 as well as the overall purport of the pleadings, each of the following circumstances, which can be seen, the facts acknowledged earlier alone, alone, and the plaintiff and the defendant of this case.