Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2013, 2662"
1. On November 4, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the business of November 4, 2012, from around 09:20 to around 10:20 on November 4, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by driving a disturbance, such as drinking at “D” restaurant located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is operated by the victim B, such as croping a large amount of “spacker” and pushing the restaurant table, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.
2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the same time and place as that of paragraph 1, destroyed the victim’s property to the extent of KRW 200,000,000 of the repair cost, by closely pushing the restaurant table on the restaurant hold, which is owned by the victim B, to a size of about 60,000 won.
"2013 High Court 2690"
3. On November 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) 04:20 on November 28, 2012, from around 04:20 to 06:00, the Defendant expressed a desire to refrain from selling alcohol to the Defendant under the influence of the Defendant in D’s “D” restaurant operated by the victim B in Mapo-gu Seoul; (b) and (c) expressed the victim’s voice, such as: (a) whether the Defendant would receive money from the Defendant under the influence of the Defendant; (b) whether the Defendant would incur money from the Defendant; and (c) why the Defendant would incur money from the Defendant’s drinking; and (d) whether the Defendant would incur money from the Defendant’s drinking; and (d) expressed the Defendant’s voice to the restaurant with the largest sound called “Irop, Irop, Irpath,” and (e) expressed the customers in the said restaurant, thereby interfering with the Defendant’s restaurant business by force.
"2013, 2675"
4. On January 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered a “F cafeteria” operated by the Victim E in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 2, 2013; (b) ordered food and drink; (c) and (d) followed by singing without any justifiable reason.
Therefore, when the above restaurant female workers were demanded to be able to view, the defendant took the bath of "the death of the arm's length of the arm's length in the arm's length", and took the bath of "the death of the woman" to G and the victim, etc. who was the guest who was flag, and "the flag and the glag death of the woman" on the same day.