logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.19 2017고단1347
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1347"

1. On February 17, 2017, at around 19:50, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the business of the Defendant: (b) obstructed the victim’s legitimate funeral services by force for about 30 minutes; (c) interfered with the victim’s lawful funeral services for 30 minutes; (d) interfered with the victim’s lawful funeral services by entering the scene in a sobscing condition; (e) hing the victim E, who is the head of the business division, without any justifiable reason; and (e) hing the game; and (e) hing the game to sound, etc.; and (e) interfered with the victim’s duties seven times in total from that time to March 5, 2017, as indicated in the list of crimes committed in the attached Table.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties in the game room at around 19:50 on February 17, 2017, and the man who had drinking at around 19:50 on February 17, 201 shall wear a plaque and interfere with his/her business.

“The police box of Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, who was called upon 112 report, was assaulted by G during the course of the police box of Suwon-gu and the police officer H, without any reason, who was requested by the police officer to answer the circumstances of the instant case.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

3. On March 1, 2017, at around 22:50, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim’s K and the victim’s ties in Suwon-si I; and (b) expressed the victim’s friendly desire to “YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

"2017 Highest 2752"

1. In collusion with L on February 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) in the “O point” operated by the victim N in Suwon-si M on February 22, 2017, the Defendant: (b) in fact, even though the Defendant and L did not have the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, the Defendant is deemed to have paid the drinking value in total KRW 55,00,000 to the victim as if he would pay the drinking value.

arrow