Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for ten months, each of the defendants B.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the ten-month period due to a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on November 17, 2017, and the sentence became final and conclusive on November 25, 2017.

[2] The defendants are the "D Game Chapter" on the third floor of the building C at the time of strike, and the defendant B is the manager of the above game site.

On July 1, 2017, the Defendants conspired to exchange 10% of the points earned by E from a game machine, such as NAV, using a game machine on the screen, and exchanged in cash through employees who are in fact, the Defendants made an unspecified number of customers to do gambling and other speculative acts by using the game machine. From July 10, 2017 to August 5, 2017, the Defendants had them do so by using the game material.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Three copies and each account book;

1. A detailed statement of the processing of each reported case;

1. Previous conviction (B): Application of a reply letter of inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (B previous conviction and attachment of judgment);

1. Relevant Article 44(1)1 and Article 28 Subparag. 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the Defendants on criminal facts: The Defendants’ selection of punishment for imprisonment;

1. Defendant B who handles concurrent crimes: After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1);

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of a community service order: Operation of a game hall that encourages speculation by means of money exchange, etc. with regard to the outcome of a game with reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act can escape from an economic difficulty due to a single-net behavior by taking advantage of the desire of the socially weak.