logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.25 2017고단1279
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by eight months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Brane car in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

A. On October 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.124% among blood transfusion around 18:55 on October 16, 2016, and led the three-lane road, among the five-lane roads in front of Gwangju Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, to flow the three-lane road into the luminous shooting distance from the high-speed bank.

At the time, it was difficult to view the vehicle at night. On the front side of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, the victim D (in South and the age of 33) stopped in the signal atmosphere. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle while looking at the front and rear side of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in driving the victim E-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence.

B. On October 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.124% in blood around 19:40 on October 16, 201, and continued to drive the said car in the same direction as that set forth in paragraph (a) above.

At the time, it was difficult to view the vehicle at night. On the front side of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, the victim F (V, 66 years old) was stopped in the signal atmosphere, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately operating the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle while looking at the front and rear side of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and due to the negligence of the defendant, and the part before the driver's seat of the victim's G self-employed car is even even before the chief of the defendant's vehicle.

arrow