The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around 20:04 on December 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) changed the vehicle from the two lanes to the two lanes of Egypian Road, Dong-dong, Seo-gu, Sungnam-si; and (b) subsequently, the victim C, who was following the stop of the vehicle, was able to turn on the rise of the victim C; (c) the victim was able to turn on the right-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-hand-ho, the Defendant damaged another’s property so that the repair cost would be 285,000 won.

2. According to the witness C’s legal statement, there is no fact that he accepted the rear border of the instant vehicle, and the Defendant did not have any functional difference in his post-exploitation, and the fact that an unexploited screen occurred to the extent that it is difficult to view it in detail. Thus, it is difficult to deem the Defendant to have damaged the property solely on such fact.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure