beta
Text
1. The part against the plaintiff in the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.
2. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 30,000,000 and its amount.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
가. 피고는 2008. 8. 29. 23:44경 책임보험에 가입되어 있지 아니한 F 코란도 승용차를 운전하여 서울 강서구 I 앞 편도 3차로 도로의 1차로를 우장산입구사거리에서 강서구청사거리 방면으로 진행하던 중, 진행 방향 좌측에서 우측으로 도로를 무단횡단하던 G의 우측 머리 부분을 위 차량의 좌측 백미러로 충격하여, G으로 하여금 머리뼈바닥의 폐쇄성 골절, 귓속뼈의 불연속 및 탈구, 전체 안근마비 등 상해를 입게 하였다.
B. The Plaintiff is a trustee of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Business under Article 30 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and paid to G the amount of compensation of KRW 20,000,000 on January 2, 2009, and KRW 30,000,000 on July 3, 2013.
C. The following disability of G due to the instant accident is two parts of the Bridges (Article 29-15 of the Enforcement Decree of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act) and the Ansan Movement Disability (Class 8 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act). The maximum amount of each liability insurance money is KRW 20,000,000 and KRW 50,000,000, and the total amount of damages is KRW 174,000,000.
[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages suffered by G as a driver of the said car. As above, as to the Plaintiff who paid the compensation amount of KRW 50,00,000,000 among the damages as claimed by the Plaintiff, the Defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at each rate of 20% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from January 2, 2009 to July 3, 2013 to the existence and scope of the obligation of each Defendant for KRW 18,00,000 from July 3, 2013 to April 30, 2015, and from the next day to the date of full payment, damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 50,00 per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment.
3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair.