logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.03.26 2017고단7114
응급의료에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, emergency treatment, or medical treatment of an emergency patient by persons engaged in emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat, or other means.

The Defendant, together with B and C, got the fingers of alcohol into a shoulder malm, visited the emergency room of the E Hospital located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si.

On October 9, 2017, the Defendant expressed a large voice to the above F on the ground that the F, who is a nurse, was waiting for medical treatment in the above emergency room on October 21, 2017, does not take a constant medical treatment. “C”

I will die.

“Intimidating”, harming the shoulder of a person, etc., and obstructing the treatment of nurses, etc. while returning to an emergency room for about 35 minutes in large sounds.

B, C also interfered with the treatment of the nurse, etc. of the emergency room in the emergency room, on the ground that the nurse, etc. of the emergency room did not immediately treat the defendant immediately.

In collusion with B and C, the Defendant interfered with emergency treatment or treatment of emergency patients by means of assault, intimidation or force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol of photographs of each police police officer against B and C;

1. A written statement of G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to record on-site photographs, CCTV CDs, CCTV video images;

1. Article 60 (1) 1 and 12 of the Act on the pertinent Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and the Emergency Medical Service for the Selection of Punishment, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which had the record of being punished by the defendant for the same criminal offense, in particular, committed the instant crime without being aware of it during the period of suspension of execution due to violence, in light of the content and method of the instant crime, the nature of the crime is not good, the Defendant’s confession during the instant crime is against himself/herself, and the Defendant appears to have committed a contingent crime due to alcohol.

arrow