Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of the above main church as a member of the D church located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu's apartment building No. 408.

When the Defendant lost the Defendant in the case of an application for appointment of a temporary custodian No. 1, 2015, 1003, Seoul Northern District Court No. 1, Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2015, the Defendant brought an appeal against the Seoul High Court (No. 2015Ra 20716) to the Seoul High Court to arbitrarily prepare and submit a joint signature in the name of the owner of the main shop divided in C, while filing an appeal with the Seoul High Court.

1. The Defendant forged private documents at the Seoul High Court, a case in which the Defendant filed an appeal at the time, where the Defendant was filed an appeal at an influence place on March 2016.

In the case of an application for the appointment of a temporary manager No. 2015Ra 20716, the person who was the owner of the classification at the time of submitting the application to prove that the content of his/her written application was true.

Despite the absence of consent from F, the number column of 14 pages A4, which is written as C's annual list of owners of the C' commercial buildings, forged a list of F's annual names, which is private documents related to the facts for the purpose of using the F's arbitrary entry into F's name in the name column of the owner and F's name column of 208, the name of the owner in the name of the F's name in Seoul, and the name of F's name

2. Around March 4, 2016, the Defendant submitted a false list of the forged annual documents to the Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court) upon submitting a written application for carbon to the 40 civil department.

Accordingly, the defendant submitted the above annual list and exercised it as he did not know of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigation report (F counterpart), investigation report (report on the execution of investigation by the F phone call for a witness);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing complaints;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.