logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.12.13 2017노2896
대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each sentence (i.e., imprisonment of 10 months, 2 years of suspended sentence, 4 months of suspended sentence, 2 years of suspended sentence, 3 months of imprisonment of 6 months, 2 years of suspended sentence, 4 years of suspended sentence, 3 years of suspended sentence, 4 years of suspended sentence, 3 million won of a fine of 3 million won) that the court below sentenced the Defendants is too un

2. Compared to the judgment of the court below, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions for the defendants, and considering the various sentencing conditions for the defendants as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the court below's each sentence imposed on the defendants cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor’s appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the part “Defendant A, C, and D” in the 3 conduct of the 5th page of the judgment below is obvious that it is a clerical error of “Defendant A, B, and D.”

arrow