The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendants (i.e., one year of imprisonment, three years of probation, 160 hours of community service order, 40 hours of sexual traffic prevention, confiscation evidence 1, 3860,000 won of the order to attend a lecture, and (ii) Defendant B: four months of imprisonment, one year of suspended execution, one year of suspended execution, three years of suspended execution, two years of suspended execution, and 1.2 million won of the additional collection) are too uneasible.

2. Compared to the judgment of the court below, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions for the defendants, and considering the various sentencing conditions for the defendants as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the court below's each sentence imposed on the defendants cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 87(1)2, Article 33(2), and Article 82(3) of the Medical Service Act on the grounds that the part of “Article 87(1)2, Article 33(2), and Article 82(3) of the former Medical Service Act” is a clerical error in the “Article 87(1)2, Article 33(2), and Article 82(3) of the former Medical Service Act (Amended by Act No. 1438, Dec. 20, 2016). Thus, it is evident that it is a clerical error in the “Article 25(1)2, Article 25(1) of the Rules on the Criminal Procedure”.