Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Criminal facts

1. On August 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) called “E” in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D’s main place for entertainment in Gangseo-gu, the Defendant: (b) called “E”; (c) called “G’s “G” report operated by Party B in a usual trading relationship; (d) sent H to the Dominna, and (e) received a request from F to go to the Dominna, and (e) received a request from H to go to go to the Dominna, and (e) assisted sexual traffic by guiding H and F to go to the “J” conference located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I.

2. Defendant B

(a) A person who intends to operate a fee job placement service in violation of the Employment Stabilization Act shall register with the head of the competent Gu;

Nevertheless, on August 19, 2016, the Defendant, without registering, operated a room for the mutual report of “G” in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government K Branch, and sent a singing voice from “E” entertainment shop A.

In response to the request, H, a female employee he/she has employed, as a result of an arrangement, was introduced to receive KRW 90,000 at two hours, and 20,000,000 among them, as a broker, was introduced to the above entertainment drinking point.

Accordingly, the defendant did not register the job placement service without registering it.

B. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) Defendant 1 sent a letter of help from Defendant 1, the owner of entertainment establishments, “E” and “E” entertainment establishments.

He sent H, who is a female employee of his employer, to the above entertainment shop to the above entertainment shop, and through A, received 2.60,000 won for sexual traffic from F, the customer, and H had H have a sexual intercourse with F at the above paragraph 1 "J" guest room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol concerning the examination of suspects of F and H by the prosecution;

1. Article 1 of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 19(1)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Selection of a fine

B. Defendant B.