logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.09.29 2016고단1145
직업안정법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who intends to provide domestic fee-charging job placement services shall register with a branch office of a Special Self-Governing Province having jurisdiction over the location of the main office.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not register a fee job placement service with the competent authorities, and sent the entertainment delivery helper from the owner of the entertainment delivery store in the name of "C" around 2, 2016, around 2, 2016.

In other words, two amusement reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception

In addition, from around December 2, 2015 to April 2, 2016, the Defendant opened a prompt report room of the trade name “G” in the Namcheon-si E and F Company from around December 2, 2016, and, upon entering the HK car in the capacity of HK car, offered entertainment reception workers on board, and received 30,000 won per hour for each entertainment week near the above area, and received 5,00 won among them as an intermediary expenses.

Accordingly, the defendant did not register the job placement business and paid job placement business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to I and D;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 47 subparagraph 1 of the relevant Act and Articles 47 and 19 (1) of the Act on the Stabilization of Employment and Stability of Punishment for Criminal Facts, and Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation is the criminal records of the defendant, in particular, the fact that the defendant committed the same crime again after being given a summary order and six months, is disadvantageous to the defendant.

The punishment shall be determined as ordered to prevent the defendant from repeating the crime.

arrow