Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the husband of the victim B (math, 58 years of age), and is the wife of the victim C (math, 39 years of age) who is the father of the victim B.

1. On August 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 21:50 on August 8, 2018, at the victim’s house located in Seocheon-si; (b) during the dispute with the victim’s debt; (c) during the dispute with the victim’s B, the Defendant took the bath for the victim, such as “this fransium, this flusium, and b)”; and (d) took the part of the victim’s flusium at one time by hand, with the victim’s hand stored in the victim’s flusium, and assaulted the victim to suit the part of the buckbs

2. On August 15, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.: (a) around 12:48, at the victim’s house as indicated in Paragraph (1) of the same Article; (b) on the ground that the said victim’s house in the process of the auction procedure was intended to dispose of it to another person; (c) but the said B did not revoke the above auction procedure; (d) using mobile phones, the Defendant sent a text message, “I think of the need to find the need to set up within the world and the earth, so I think of the corresponding comments, and send one time the text message to the victim C, “I think of the distance between the court and one time,” and then sent it to the victim, from August 9, 2018 to October 17 of the same month, the text message creating fear or apprehensions over eight times, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Defendant’s suspect interrogation protocol of the police on October 22, 2018

1. Each police statement concerning B and C;

1. A report on internal affairs (afix of photographs by capturing letters or mers);

1. The defendant's defense counsel in a report on internal affairs asserts that it does not constitute repeated arrival of any content inducing fear or apprehensions, in light of the process, details, frequency, etc. of sending letters by the defendant;

The evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court.