1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was treated by the Defendant as a fluorative treatment and fluoral removal between September 11, 2009 and April 30, 2013.

At this time, the defendant damaged the plaintiff's pacia with the dryle et al., and the spaci or foreign substance intrudes into the part, which led to the second dyle on the left side of the plaintiff's upper music, the first dyle on the right side and second dyle on

The Defendant granted the Plaintiff a Switzerland decoration with the Switzerland highest-level product, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 6 million to the Plaintiff, but the Defendant isolated the low-price product that is not manufactured, thereby defrauding 6 million won.

Therefore, the defendant should pay to the plaintiff KRW 3 million and KRW 10 million for medical expenses due to damage to dental services, and KRW 20 million for consolation money.

2. Examining whether the Defendant damaged a child by using a dryry, etc. during the treatment of the removal of drys against the Plaintiff, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to accept the determination, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Then, as to whether the Defendant used the Switzerland’s highest class product to carry out the ice surgery on the part of the Plaintiff, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, including the evidence No. 3, is insufficient to recognize this.

Therefore, as long as the plaintiff's assertion is not recognized in entirety, the plaintiff's claim for damages premised on this premise is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.