beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① 21 days of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as 20 days of the judgment of the court of first instance; ② 8, 17, and 19 of the 8, 17, and 19 of the 8, "(this court recommended that the plaintiff be present at the fifth day of pleading for the purpose of viewing the current status of the plaintiff, but the plaintiff did not comply with it)"; ③ 9, 19, "Article 9-2 (1) 3-2 (a) of the Decree on the Appointment of Education" in Article 9-2 (1) 3-2 (a) of the former Decree on the Appointment of Education (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26856, Jan. 6, 2016) shall be deemed to be "Article 9-2 (1) 3-2 (a) of the former Decree on the Appointment of Education (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26856, Jan. 6, 2016); ④ The relevant provisions of the 13 shall be amended or added.
- Parts used or added - Parts 7, 13, and 14 of the first instance judgment (the part added between the 7th and 14 of the first instance judgment) were determined by the disability grade 5 on March 27, 2014 in the procedures for registration of persons with disabilities under Article 32 of the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities, but the part was determined outside the disability grade for the language part. D) Plaintiff’s video (Evidence 7-1, 2 of the evidence 7-1, 2016) taken the daily life of the Plaintiff around November 2016, the Plaintiff is inaccurate at the time of conversation and is unable to input the computer’s own plate by misunderstanding.
E. On August 17, 2017, the Plaintiff appeared at the first date for pleading of this Court. However, at the time of oral argument, it was difficult for the Plaintiff to communicate smoothly by dividing the horses, and the Plaintiff showed the view of walking the bridge to be dried and unstable.
Part 8 of the judgment of the first instance court with the "written evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8, and 9" written in Gap evidence No. 8, Eul evidence No. 1 through 6, 8, and 9, and evidence No. 7-1 and No. 2" written in the part 8 of the judgment of the first instance.
Court Decision No. 9.0