logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.12.17 2015고단2966
음악산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A A Fines of 1.5 million won, Defendant B of a fine of 300,000 won, Defendant C of a fine of 50,000 won, and Defendant D of a fine of 1.5 million won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant D’s violation of the Employment Security Act is a person who operates a news report room, namely, “E”, in which the Defendant introduces a woman-dominance in a singing room or a singran bar while carrying five female-dominants on the part of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On August 28, 2015, the Defendant did not register with the competent authority, and provided “Fju” B and C at the request of A, who is a dynasium proprietor, and provided “Fju” with the dynasium B and C, and received KRW 7,000 per hour from the above dynasium as a job placement fee.

2. Violation of the Food Sanitation Act by the defendant A, B, and C

A. Defendant A is a person who operates a dan with the trade name “Fjuk” in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Underground.

No person shall drink alcoholic beverages with customers, provide entertainment services by singing or dancing, or arrange such acts to provide any third person at a place where food service business is operated for profit.

Nevertheless, at around 23:20 on August 28, 2015, the Defendant directed three customers, including H, who found the above entertainment bar, on two occasions. On the other hand, the Defendant agreed to contact D, which is a "E" news room business operator, to provide 30,00 won per hour, and arranged them to provide entertainment services to customers, such as having the said players enjoy dancing with the said customers, and having them talk with the said customers.

B. Defendants B and C are above.

At the same time, at the same time and place as the above A received KRW 30,00 per hour from the above A, and the said customer provided entertainment to the customer by singing and drinking with the said customer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of each police interrogation protocol to the Defendants

1. Article 98 of the Food Sanitation Act and Article 98 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Criminal Offenders A, B, C: Article 98 of the same Act.

arrow