The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment of unfair sentencing refers to the case where the sentence of the judgment of the court below is too heavy or too minor in light of the content of the specific case.

Based on the statutory penalty, the sentencing is a discretionary judgment that takes place within a reasonable and appropriate scope by comprehensively taking into account the conditions of the sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act based on the statutory penalty, and there is a unique area of the first instance court in our Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the direct principle.

In addition to these circumstances and the ex post facto nature of the appellate court, if there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court is not beyond the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(2) In light of the aforementioned circumstances, the lower court rendered the above sentence to the Defendant on July 23, 2015 (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In full view of the following factors: (a) under favorable circumstances in which the Defendant recognized each of the instant offenses and reflects the Defendant; (b) the Defendant committed the instant thief and the embezzlement of stolen property, despite having been sentenced several times, the Defendant committed the instant crime of larceny and possession; and (c) the victims failed to recover damage therefrom; and (d) there was no special circumstance or change of circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing in the trial; (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive and background of the offense, and all of the sentencing factors indicated in the instant records and pleadings, such as the circumstances after the commission of the offense, the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.