logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.10.01 2019노1013
공무집행방해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of unfair sentencing refers to the case where the sentence of the judgment of the court below is too heavy or too minor in light of the content of the specific case.

Based on the statutory penalty, the sentencing is a discretionary judgment that takes place within a reasonable and appropriate scope by comprehensively taking into account the conditions of the sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act based on the statutory penalty, and there is a unique area of the first instance court in our Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the direct principle.

In addition to these circumstances and the ex post facto nature of the appellate court, if there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court is not beyond the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(2) In light of the aforementioned circumstances and circumstances, the lower court, in light of the following circumstances, rendered the sentence to the Defendant on July 23, 2015 (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). In so doing, the lower court did not appear to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because the sentencing of the lower court is too too too unreasonable, and thus, exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed a crime in favor of recognizing the Defendant; (b) the Defendant committed a second offense during the period of suspension of execution of the same kind of crime; and (c) there is no special circumstance or change in circumstances that may be

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow