1. Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)’s Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) pursuant to the decision of the Personnel Committee established on October 18, 2013.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed as the same.

Facts of recognition

A. The Plaintiff entered the Defendant Union around March 1995, and the head of the economic division has been in charge of economic-related general affairs from March 2010.

B. On December 2, 2008, the Defendant Cooperative decided to carry out the meat construction business (hereinafter “instant business”) for slaughter, processing, and selling Korea-style cattle produced by its members in a temporary society by purchasing Korea-style milk produced by its members in a temporary society.

C. On March 30, 2010, the board of directors of the Defendant Union selected C department store D as a trustee of the instant business, and the Defendant Union concluded with D on April 20, 2010 a “land processing plant lease and livestock product supply contract” with D and contracted the instant business to D.

On May 201, 201, the regular audit of the headquarters of the NANNN on the Defendant Cooperative was conducted in the middle of May 201, and the result of the audit was pointed out and recommended that it is inappropriate to operate the instant project by a contracting method, the Defendant Cooperative, upon the resolution of the board of directors, concluded a commission sales contract and human resources contract for the instant project with D on May 26, 201.

E. D, from May 201 to May 2013, 201, through the process of selling livestock products upon entrustment of the instant business of the Defendant Union from May 201 to May 2013, 939,685,084 won was embezzled by the so-called “scambling in stock boxes” method, which arbitrarily disposes of the stock products and contains other products in stock boxes.

F. On October 18, 2013, the Secretariat of the Audit and Inspection Committee of the Agricultural Cooperatives Federation (hereinafter “Central Audit and Inspection Committee”) determined the amount of damages incurred to the Defendant Union due to D’s embezzlement as KRW 939,657,00,00, and among them, determined the responsibility of officers and employees, including the Plaintiff, as set forth below, as KRW 242,90,000, the amount of disciplinary action requested by the Cooperative Audit and Inspection Committee was determined as follows.

The disciplinary action (defluence) person subject to the request for disciplinary action, the amount of compensation for the disciplinary action (refluence) requested, shall be subject to the disciplinary action 90,200,200,000 heads of G Reprimand 46,90,000,000 heads of G Reprimand 20,700,000,000 heads of G Reprimand.