beta
Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 2,203,00.
2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.
3. The costs of lawsuit: 9.0
Reasons
1. Circumstances leading to the dispute of this case;
A. On May 9, 2008, the Plaintiff Union decided to conduct a business of lending aggregate buildings, etc. (hereinafter “the instant loan business”) on the security outside the business territory of the Plaintiff Union, calculated a reasonable amount of loan after the employees in charge assessed the value of the security and then conducted the instant business through a resolution of the Loan Review Committee. The Defendant was in charge of the business of evaluating the value of each loan including each loan listed in the attached Table, as an exaggerated agent, while performing the loan business including each loan listed in the attached Table.
B. When the audit committee of the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (hereinafter “FF”) conducted an audit of the Plaintiff Union from May 21, 2012 to May 25, 2012, the Defendant and executive officers and employees of the Plaintiff Union were to promote each of the instant loans in violation of the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation’s credit operating manual and guidance documents, and decided to request the Plaintiff Union to take disciplinary action, etc. thereon.
C. On November 29, 2012, the Agricultural Cooperatives Federation sent a notice of resolution by the Audit and Inspection Committee on the Plaintiff Union’s disciplinary action against the Plaintiff Union, stating that “The Defendant requires the Defendant to take a one-month disciplinary action and compensate of KRW 4,500,000 with respect to loans for which the damage was determined by the time the decision was made, and that the damage was not determined later, with respect to the portion for which the damage was not determined.”
During the period from May 19, 2009 to December 15, 2009, the Defendant conducted an appraisal for loans of KRW 40,2408,00,000 for loans outside the region, and did not conduct an on-site investigation on goods outside the region, and received a confirmation certificate of market price that was investigated through a real estate brokerage office without going through an objective transaction case, etc. by facsimile, etc. from the transaction C.