logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.09.10 2015고단296
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 296"

1. From August 1, 200, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Suwon North Korea Branch, and traded household checks from around August 1, 200.

On September 30, 2014, the Defendant issued a check number E, face value 3 million won, and a bank check under the name of the Defendant as of November 30, 2014, which was issued on September 30, 2014, issued at a pharmacy called “D pharmacy” in Mapo-gu Seoul, Seoul, and presented a payment proposal within the period for payment, but did not receive the deposit shortage, and issued a six copies of the household check equivalent to the sum of face value 18,00,000,000 won in total at the above place, and presented a payment proposal within the period for the payment proposal, but did not receive the deposit shortage, etc.

2. The Defendant entered into a check contract with the Bank of Korea branch from October 21, 2010, and traded household checks.

On June 30, 2014, the Defendant issued a check number F, face value “F”, “five million won”, and “the date of issuance” under the name of the Defendant, and issued a check under the name of the said bank under the name of the said Defendant, and presented a payment proposal within the period for which payment was made, but did not receive payment as a disposition of suspension of transaction, and issued two copies of the household check worth KRW 10,000,000 in total and presented a payment proposal within the period for which payment was made within the period for which the bearer was not made, as shown in the attached Table 2 of the List of Crimes, but did not receive the disposition of suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each household check;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The part concerning dismissal of prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. Facts charged [2015 Highest 597]

arrow