A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On June 19, 2007, the Defendant entered into a household check contract with the new bank head and entered into a household check contract with the new bank head and entered into a check transaction.

[2014 Highest 3434] On October 30, 2013, the Defendant issued one copy of the above bank check under the name of the Defendant, which is the check E, face value 5,00,000,000 won, and the date of issuance, at the office D office in the total book sales market operated by the Defendant in Yangju-si, which is located in Yangju-si, and presented a payment proposal on June 30, 2014 during the period of presentment for payment, but did not receive a shortage of deposit.

The Defendant, including that, from around that time to May 15, 2014, issued a total amount of KRW 60 million equivalent to the total face value of 12 books of household checks through the same method over 12 times, such as the No. 3, 6, 8, and 17 of the attached Table of Crimes, and presented a payment proposal within the period for which payment was made by each holder, but did not receive due to shortage of deposits or suspension of transactions.

[2014 Highest 4772] around May 1, 2014, the Defendant issued three copies of the check number 5,000,000 won in the book board D office located in Yangju-si, each of which is “F,” “F,” “G,” and “H,” and presented three copies of the above bank bank household check in the name of the Defendant, which is “H,” and offered each payment proposal on September 1, 2014 during the period of presentment for payment, but did not receive the disposition of suspension of transaction.

Accordingly, the defendant issued a total of KRW 15 million in household checks and did not receive it as a disposition of suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 3434]

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Each accusation;

1. A copy of each household check (2014 highest 4772);

1. Statement of the accused in the second protocol of trial;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each accusation (including a copy of a check attached thereto);

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Control of Illegal Check which enables

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Criminal punishment under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act;