2010 Highest 2206 Occupational Embezzlement, Fraud

ThisA (59 years old, South)

An Order of Merit

1. Attorneys Cho Han-sung and Lee Sung-sung;

2. Law firms and law firms, attorneys Lee Jung-jin and White Jinsa;

July 13, 2010

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Criminal History Office

1. Occupational embezzlement;

In 195, the defendant was appointed as assistant professor at the Department of Machinery and Engineering, and is in office as professor until now, and is currently in office as the head of the High-Tech Free Trade and Energy Center at the same university, the head of the Energy Manpower Training Center, and the head of BK.

In relation to the research tasks carried out by the defendant, the defendant did not arbitrarily use all personnel expenses for research assistants paid to researchers in the Free-Aid and Energy Research Center (hereinafter referred to as "Researchers") who are professors of the victim's instruction, while the defendant managed them as laboratory public funds, he used some of them as joint laboratory expenses, such as monthly pay of researchers, etc., as part of them used for the defendant's personal use.

As a result, from around May 198, the Defendant appointed one general secretary to take charge of the practical management and execution of the research fund from among the researchers according to the direction of the Defendant, and made the general secretary open and manage the facilities passbook, and made the researchers deposit the total amount of the personnel expenses to be deposited in the respective receipt passbook of the personnel expenses into the above actual expenses passbook. The researcher manages the funds created through the general affairs of the research fund and used some of them as joint expenses of the researchers’ monthly salary and others, and used them for the Defendant’s personal expenses. Meanwhile, around May 2005, the Defendant experienced the crisis that the use of the research fund for university professors’ research funds is socially at issue. On the other hand, in lieu of the existing management method where the above evidence remains, the researcher has the personnel expenses deposited in the receipt passbook of the personnel expenses of each person, and the amount is allowed to be used individually as the monthly salary paid by the Defendant to the extent determined by the direction of the Defendant, and changed the details of the research fund to the Defendant’s general management method, such as the management method.

피고인은 위와 같은 방법으로 연구실 공금을 총괄 관리하면서, 2003. 5. 14.경 당시 총무인 이C에게 지시하여 실비 통장인 이C 명의의 ◆ 계좌(계좌번호:***-**-******)에 들어 있던 연구실 공금 중 984만 원을 피고인 명의의 ◆ 계좌(계좌번호: ***-**-******)로 송금토록 한 후 피고인의 부동산을 구입하는 데 사용한 것을 비롯하여 그때부터 2010. 4. 2.까지 사이에 별지 범죄일람표(1) (생략) 에 기재된 것과 같이 총 106회에 걸쳐 연구실 공금 합계 195,767,315원을 사적인 용도로 사용하여 이를 횡령하였다.

2. Fraud;

가. 피고인은 2003. 5.경 피해자인 대학교 산학협력단 소속 담당자를 상대로 위 연구실 소속 연구원인 안C1에게 피고인이 수행하는 연구 과제 관련 인건비가 정상적으로 지급되는 것인 양 안C1에 대한 인건비를 허위 신청하였다. 그러나 피고인은 위 담당자가 안C1 명의의 인건비 수령 계좌(◆, 계좌번호: ***-**-*****)로 인건비를 입금하여 주더라도 사실은 피고인이 위 계좌를 직접 관리하면서 그 금원을 안C1에게 전혀 지급하지 아니하고 피고인의 부동산 구입, 주식 투자 등 피고인 개인 용도로 전액 사용할 의도였다.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the above person in charge, derived from receiving KRW 907,200,00 as personnel expenses for Ansan1 on May 9, 2003 from that person, as the above, he received KRW 907,20 from that person, as the personnel expenses for Ansan1, and acquired KRW 257,243,482 in total over 152 times from that person until January 18, 2008, as stated in the crime inundation (2-1 (Omission) of the attached Table.

The Defendant, by the same method from May 9, 2003 to January 18, 2008, acquired the total labor cost of 307,874,182 won for three researchers, as shown in the attached Table (2)-1-2 (2)-3) (Omission).

나. 피고인은 2003. 5.경 피해자인 대학교 산학협력단 소속 담당자를 상대로 위 연구실 소속 연구원인 이C2에게 피고인이 수행하는 연구과제 관련 인건비가 정상적으로 지급되는 것인 양 이C2에 대한 인건비를 허위 신청하였다. 그러나 피고인은 위 담당자가 이C2의 인건비 수령 계좌로 인건비를 입금하여 주더라도 사실은 그 인건비를 이C2에게 사용토록 하지 아니하고 피고인이 관리하는 안C1의 위 ◆ 계좌로 돌려받아 피고인의 부동산 구입, 주식 투자 등 피고인 개인 용도로 전액 사용할 의도였다.

피고인은 위와 같이 위 담당자를 기망하여 이에 속은 동인으로부터 2003. 5.경 이C2에 대한 인건비 명목으로 1,134,000원을 이C2의 위 계좌로 송금받아 이를 2003. 5. 6. 다시 안C1의 위 ◆ 계좌로 돌려받은 것을 비롯하여 그때부터 2006. 1.경까지 사이에 별지 범죄일람표(3) (생략) 에 기재된 것과 같이 총 24회에 걸쳐 같은 방법으로 총 7명의 연구원에 대한 인건비 합계 42,965,104원을 편취하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each prosecutor’s protocol of statement concerning the PC3, AC1, AC4, AC5, C5, C6, C7, Park C7, C8, EC9, and Park C10;

1. Details of each account, current status of real estate, certified copy of real estate register, and the application of statutes;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Articles 356 and 355(1) of the Criminal Act (in the case of occupational embezzlement, inclusive) and 347(1) (Fraud) of the Criminal Act, each of the choice of imprisonment

2. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act

3. Suspension of execution;

Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act ( normal consideration of the first crime, the fact that the person has endeavored to recover from damage, etc.)

Pakistan-Pariju