[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and fines for 600,000 won shall be determined

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On April 5, 2016, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) Police Officers and Co-Defendant B who are investigating the assault case in the D District located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju; and (b) Police Officers of the Republic of Korea and Co-Defendant B of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f

D. Abrupted and crupted the crupte . “Pulp.” and performed a disturbance within the government office for about 30 minutes, by brupting the crupte.

In the facts of criminal complaint, Defendant A stated that Defendant A provided the above bath to police officers. However, according to the evidence duly examined by this court, the part of “I have to begin to meet the requirements” among the bath theory written in the facts charged appears to have been done to Defendant B, and there is no impediment to Defendant A’s exercise of the right to defense. Therefore, the correction was made as above.

B. Around April 5, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 21:35 on April 5, 2016, in order to take photographs of the D District E’s face and eye part of the Defendant’s damage, the circumstances where the D District is investigating the assault case at the location described in the foregoing paragraph (a).

“On the other hand, the police officers interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by assaulting the above E’s right side part and the two parts, such as the two parts.

2. On April 5, 2016, around 21:35, the Defendant assaulted the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties, such as preventing the Defendant from photographing the damaged parts E, while investigating the assault case at the location described in paragraph (a) of Article 1, and obstructing the police officer’s photographing of the damaged parts of the DNA while investigating the assault case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. A written statement of the main officer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in Chapter 7 to a investigative report (verification of CCTV image data in a earth belt) and a photograph of a closure;

1. Article 146 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and subparagraph A of the choice of punishment: Article 146 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment).