1. The Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

2. However, it is against the Defendants for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 8, 2014, at around 02:0, the Defendants, upon receiving a report from the “F restaurant” located in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and by threatening the main owner of the place, was confirmed the facts of the crime from H and the victim slope I (the age of 42).

At this time, the Defendants, together with the above police officers, were arrested as a flagrant offender of obstruction of the performance of official duties by putting the body of the above police officers “a singing off, sing off, sing off, and ging off their clothes.” The Defendants were arrested as a flagrant offender of obstruction of the performance of official duties.

Defendants resisting this resistance, Defendant A resisting the left part of the above H by drinking, and Defendant A pushed the chest on several occasions, and Defendant B snicked the said I’s bridge by walking on several occasions with his hand and then sucked with his hand.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by the above police officers on the handling of the 112 Report Report Case, and at the same time, they jointly committed a serious verte of the first bones of the body that requires approximately five weeks medical treatment to the victim I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to J, I, H, and K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, concerning the facts of the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the Sentencing Committee within the scope of the sentencing guidelines set forth in Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the victim’s refusal of punishment, the defendants’ reflects the fact that they are the defendants, the defendants have an opportunity to know about himself through detention, the defendant A has no criminal records of the suspension of execution or more, the defendant B has no criminal records of the same kind of criminal records