beta
Text
1.(a)
Defendant C expressed its intent to transfer 24,00 shares out of the shares listed in the attached list to the Plaintiff, and Defendant C.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) was established on October 4, 2005, and as regards 12,000 shares out of 30,000 shares issued at the time, the Plaintiff was registered as shareholders in the register of shareholders as to each of 9,00 shares.
B. Defendant Company issued new shares of 60,000 shares on May 28, 2010; among them, the Plaintiff was listed in the shareholder registry as Defendant B and C with respect to each of 15,000 shares as to each of 30,00 shares.
Accordingly, as of March 13, 2013, the number of stocks listed in the shareholder list of the defendant company as of March 13, 2013 are as follows:
(C) Defendant C 240,000 Won 240,000 Won 240,000 Won 240,000 Won 2,000 Won 2,42,000 won per share of the number of shareholders per share of “the shares of this case” (hereinafter the above shares) totaling KRW 240,000 per share of KRW 10,000 per share of KRW 240,000,000.
As to the shares of this case, the shares of this case are not issued at present.
On October 14, 2012, the Plaintiff’s husband, deceased on October 14, 2012, and the heir is the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, who is the wife, F.
【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 3, 5, 19, 20, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Summary of the Plaintiff’s claim
A. At the time of incorporation of the Defendant Company, the Plaintiff received KRW 300 million from the deceased, who is the husband, and paid all of them as share capital. In order to avoid a prosperity in the process of incorporation, the Plaintiff entrusted the name of the Defendant B and C with each of the 30,000 shares issued in each of 30,00 shares.
Since then, the plaintiff paid 60 million won as share capital in the process of increasing 60,000 shares, and as to each of 15,000 shares, the plaintiff trusted the name of the defendant B and C.
Therefore, 24,00 of the shares of this case, each of Defendant B and C, is owned by the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff is served with a duplicate of the complaint of this case.