Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

around 16:00 on July 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) used a gap in which the surveillance of the victim E (23 taxes, women) works as an employee within the “D convenience store” located in B, 3 e.g., Seoul, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, by taking advantage of the gap in which the surveillance of the victim E (23 taxes, women) is neglected; and (b) taken off the amount of KRW 5,800 of the market price on the display stand outside the above convenience store by hand at KRW 5,80,00 of the market price.

The theft was committed by drinking methods.

The defendant of "2017 Highly 1507" is a person who is on duty and lives without a fixed residence.

On July 17, 2017, in fact within the "G" located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 19:00, as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price for food and would pay the price for food, he would have taken profits from his property by deceiving the victim H who is an employee and making a food with an adequate contact and not paying the price of KRW 25,000.

On July 21, 2017, the Defendant, around 14:10 on July 21, 2017, 2017, cut off the victim L(29 taxes, women) who was an employee at K's clothing store located in J 1 in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, due to a lack of surveillance of the victim L(29 taxes, women) who was an employee.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 High Doz. 1465"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against M;

1. E statements;

1. The details of the stolen victim's articles, and photographs of the damaged articles 1507, 1507, taken of the victim's photograph;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. H's written statement "2017 Highly 1510";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Lritten statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act; Article 329 of the Criminal Act; Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act; and selection of each fine for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act that has no criminal history against the defendant for sentencing, and the value of the damaged goods is relatively relatively.