Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 High 663"

1. On May 10, 2017, around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) requested a victim C (51 years of age and south) to show CCTV at B management office around Jeju-si; (b) however, the Defendant got out of the victim, with both descendants who do not go to the victim; (c) caused damage to the character of face that requires approximately two weeks of treatment; and (d) caused damage to the victim and spambling.

2. From around 00:34 on July 24, 2017 to around 00:39 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed theft by a victim in front of the F convenience point in the operation of the victim E in Seogposi-si, Seopo-si; (b) took advantage of the gaps in which the victim’s business ends the above convenience store and has neglected surveillance; and (c) took 78,700 won of the market price, which is one of the victims’ possession, into G cab.

At around 01:15 on July 20, 2017, the Defendant stolen the 2.50,000 won of the market price of the victim-owned land (one knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

Summary of Evidence

"2017 High 663"

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. A E-document;

1. A report on internal investigation (a photograph of a damaged place);

1. A medical certificate of injury (C);

1. On-site and damaged photographs, 2018, 34;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a violation of Article 329 of the same Act);

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In particular, among the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument in the instant case, the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is as follows.