logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.12.19 2014고단810
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

Provided, That the execution of each of the above punishments shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person engaging in driving a car in the E SP area.

At around 21:40 on June 27, 2014, the Defendant proceeded with G neighboring roads, which are located in the Sindo City F, according to the one-lane distance from the luscison surface to the luscison surface.

At the time of night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle by reducing speed and checking well the front door.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to discover the victim H (55 years old) who was walking along the above road due to negligence, and immediately operated the Hand to the left-hand side in order to avoid this, but the Defendant did not avoid it and did so and did so to go to the ground by receiving the victim from the front right-hand glass and right-hand side part of the Defendant, and as described in paragraph (2), immediately following the vehicle operated by B, as described in paragraph (2), had the victim reverse the victim.

After all, the Defendant jointly caused the above occupational negligence to death of the victim due to the diversity damage, such as wood, breast, ship, etc. at the site.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving service of I, Ireland, and is a person who is engaged in driving service of I, Ireland.

At around 21:40 on June 27, 2014, the Defendant proceeded with G neighboring roads, which are located in the Sindo City F, according to the one-lane distance from the luscison surface to the luscison surface.

At the time of night, the front time was set at the night, and the defendant was followed by A's car prior to the same direction, so the person engaged in driving service was well aware of the situation, and there was a duty of care to secure and proceed with the safety distance to avoid when the vehicle stops.

Nevertheless, Article 1 (1) is applied to the defendant's negligence of driving too close.

arrow