1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 41,100,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from February 16, 2014 to September 17, 2014; and (b).

1. In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, Gap evidence No. 3, and evidence No. 4-1 through No. 4 as to the cause of the claim, the fact that the plaintiff lent to the plaintiff without setting the due date and interest for repayment of the total amount of KRW 5,000,000 on March 31, 2008, and the total amount of KRW 50,000,000 on April 21, 2008, and KRW 55,000,000 on December 11, 2009, KRW 5,900,000 on June 6, 2010, KRW 3,000,000 on February 3, 200, KRW 1300,000 on interest rate of KRW 400,000 on interest rate of KRW 5,000,000 on interest rate of the plaintiff.

(2) The defendant's assertion on December 12, 2009 that the plaintiff claimed for the payment of damages for delay on the above loan from December 12, 2009, but there is no evidence to acknowledge that the payment period and interest have been fixed on the above loan, and therefore, only the damages for delay from the day after the delivery of the copy of the complaint in this case is recognized). 2. The defendant's assertion on the defendant's assertion that the defendant received KRW 55,00,000 from the plaintiff, but it is alleged that the defendant paid the above KRW 13,90,000 to the plaintiff as a partner, and it was liquidated all the partnership by paying the above KRW

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.