1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff was appointed as a police officer on November 4, 1978, and was serving as a police officer on March 31, 199, and retired as an honorary inspector on March 31, 199.

B. On May 15, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “the instant wounds” was different from the Defendant’s application for the impairment of the reputation of the head of the body of the body of the head of the body of the dudual dual and the dudual / dual dunes of the head of the body of the dual dual / dual dunes of the head of the body that

C. On October 20, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision that the instant difference does not constitute a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) after deliberation and resolution by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement to the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence Nos. 1, No. 1 to 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was unlawful on October 19, 1987 that the Defendant’s disposition of this case based on a different premise, although the Plaintiff, as a police officer on an expressway, failed to comply with an inspection while conducting a vehicle inspection and tracking a vehicle that runs away on an expressway, was conducted for a traffic accident and suffered from the instant wounds due to the subsequent legacy.

B. As to the instant case, the following facts, including evidence Nos. 2, 7, and 10, and the purport of the entire pleadings, should be proved as follows: (i) the Plaintiff as a person of distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation, should first prove that the instant wounds were caused by the performance of official duties; (ii) according to the documents submitted by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the National Medical Center on October 19, 1987 as a traffic accident; and (iii) accordingly, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the National Medical Center on October 19, 1987; and (iv) the fact that the Plaintiff was receiving surgery treatment, etc. on the basis of the ball-dong dong-dong, the right upper part, the chest-hand part, and the cuple of the instant wounds, and there is no official document proving